ICANN 2026 new gTLD round · as of 7 October 2026

Nine companies filed half of the 2026 TLD round

9 companies · 826 applications · 51.2%393 companies · 788 · 48.8%
  1. 1Identity Digitalregistry216
  2. 2Link Freedom Groupregistry158
  3. 3XYZregistry139
  4. 4GoDaddy Registryregistry77
  5. 5Intercapregistry71
  6. 6Radixregistry46
  7. 7ShortDotregistry40
  8. 8Starlight (Namecheap)registrar or host40
  9. 9Googlebig tech39

ICANN published 1,614 applications for 986 strings (the word after the dot) on 7 October 2026. They were filed under 480 legal names by 402 companies. Identity Digital alone used 28 of them. Applicants that told ICANN they run a registry or a registrar, or are affiliated with one, filed 71%.

ICANN's statistics page counts 1,615 applications from 481 applicants. Its published list has 1,614 from 480 legal names (ICANN calls them applicants): application WDO2627T-T45217 is still under an administrative check. We count the list, as downloaded at 18:07 UTC on 7 October 2026.

Replacement period · 8 to 21 October

Which contests →

Switching to backups could end as many as 82 contests. In 81, no applicant has a usable backup.

An applicant may switch to its backup string once, and only if no other applicant named that string (Applicant Guidebook 5.1). 287 of the 891 applications in contests have such a backup. But some applicants named one backup in several applications, or named a string they already applied for, and two applications for one string make a new contest (5.2). So at most 251 can switch without starting a new contest. If they do, as many as 82 of the 263 contests are left with one applicant or none.

Switches recorded so far: none. What changed →

  1. 8 OctReplacement period opens
  2. 21 OctLast day to switch to a backup
  3. 17 NovString Confirmation Day; objections open
  4. 27 NovLast day to withdraw for a 65% refund
  5. 16 Mar 2027Objections close
  6. H1 2027Prioritization draw (sets ICANN's review order)

The round in seven findings

  1. 263strings are contested. Their contests hold 891 of the 1,614 applications, 55%. In 2012 it was 39%.
  2. 77contests have both Identity Digital and XYZ in them. 243 of the 263 contests include a company that already runs a registry.
  3. 59strings have closest 2012 bets with a median of 100,000 domains or more in May 2026. For 323, the median is under 10,000 or the bets are no longer live.
  4. 3.4applications per AI word, against 1.9 for the average non-brand string. .agent has 13.
  5. 4,225domains: what the median live, non-brand 2012-round TLD held in May 2026. Two in three hold under 10,000.
  6. 61brand applications came from Japanese companies, second only to the United States with 151.
  7. 33%of applications were filed under a legal name that does not name the company behind it.
Contests

263 contests, and private deals are banned

263 of the 986 strings have two or more applications. ICANN calls each one a contention set. We call it a contest.

The 2012 round had 234 contests. 16 went to an ICANN auction, which raised $240.6 million. 217 were resolved without an ICANN auction, and one is still open.

This round bans resolving a contest in private (Applicant Guidebook 5.2.3). A contest that does not end another way goes to an ICANN auction, where the winner pays the second-highest bid (5.6.3).

Each square is one contest

2012

234 contests

ICANN auction · 16resolved another way · 217still open · 1

2026

263 contests

no applicant has a usable backup · 81still contested after the most switches possible · 100could end by switching, by 21 October · 82

Of the 263, 114 have two applications, 64 have three, 32 have four and 53 have five or more.

Registries against registries

243 of the 263 contests include a company that already runs a registry. In 91, every applicant does. The pairs that meet most often:

  1. Identity Digital × XYZ77
  2. Identity Digital × Link Freedom Group68
  3. GoDaddy Registry × Identity Digital51
  4. Link Freedom Group × XYZ49
  5. Identity Digital × Radix36
  6. Identity Digital × Intercap34
  7. GoDaddy Registry × Link Freedom Group32
  8. Intercap × Link Freedom Group31

Contests the two companies share.

The largest contests

big techregistries and registrarseveryone else

  • .agent13 applications
    2 of 13 hold a usable backup
  • .bit11 applications
    3 of 11 hold a usable backup
  • .api10 applications
    4 of 10 hold a usable backup
  • .brand10 applications
    6 of 10 hold a usable backup
  • .hub10 applications
    4 of 10 hold a usable backup
  • .pop9 applications
    2 of 9 hold a usable backup
  • .robot9 applications
    2 of 9 hold a usable backup

The 200 most contested strings, ranked →Contested strings on the scoreboard →

Size

How big could these TLDs get?

For every string in this round, our AI picked up to three strings from the 2012 round that made the most similar bet, without being told what happened to them. Those are its closest 2012 bets. Below is how many domains they held in May 2026, from ICANN's monthly registry reports for May 2026.

This is a comparison, not a forecast. Each 2012 TLD is named and links to its numbers.

The middle of each string's closest 2012 bets

664 strings, by domains held in May 2026

  • 100,000 or more59
  • 10,000 to 99,999282
  • 1,000 to 9,999191
  • Under 1,000116
  • Two of three never launched or were retired16

Placed by the median of each string's closest 2012 bets, so one large bet alone does not lift a string. 316 brand strings are left out: their closest bets are 2012 dot-brands, and the median live dot-brand holds 7 domains. Six strings are left out because they are variants of TLDs that already exist.

Strings whose closest 2012 bets grew biggest

  1. .mart6 applications

    .store 2,331,133.shop 4,575,839.market 20,850

  2. .cart4 applications

    .shop 4,575,839.store 2,331,133.shopping 8,264

  3. .goods3 applications

    .store 2,331,133.shop 4,575,839.supplies 3,034

  4. .retail1 application

    .store 2,331,133.shop 4,575,839.shopping 8,264

  5. .internet1 application

    .web no figure.online 3,909,826.site 2,093,185

  6. .zzz3 applications

    .xyz 8,557,020.ooo 14,180.lol 948,744

  7. .links1 application

    .link 308,011.click 869,319.site 2,093,185

  8. .api10 applications

    .dev 689,717.app 1,389,632.cloud 539,673

  9. .stack4 applications

    .cloud 539,673.dev 689,717.app 1,389,632

  10. .cli1 application

    .dev 689,717.app 1,389,632.software 26,950

  11. .ext1 application

    .dev 689,717.app 1,389,632.ecom never launched

  12. .mem1 application

    .app 1,389,632.dev 689,717.data 4

  13. .prompt1 application

    .bot 22,597.app 1,389,632.dev 689,717

  14. .sdk1 application

    .dev 689,717.docs 3.app 1,389,632

  15. .beta2 applications

    .prod 2.dev 689,717.live 653,138

Domains held in May 2026. The middle bet is the brighter one.

AI words

AI words drew 3.4 applications each

We picked 20 strings about AI. They drew 68 applications: 3.4 per string, against 1.9 for the average non-brand string. 13 of the 20 are contested.

Identity Digital applied for 12 of them. Link Freedom Group, OpenAI and Radix applied for 7 each.

Google, Meta and OpenAI each applied for .agent as a generic string, not a brand. If one of them wins it, it cannot keep .agent for itself and its affiliates: the Applicant Guidebook bans closed generics (3.1.7).

The 20 AI words: applicants, our AI score and who applied
StringApplicationsAI score
.agent

Agent Community, Alibaba, EchoStar, Google, Identity Digital, Intercap, Internet Land & Cattle, Meitu, Meta, Nano Labs, OpenAI, Radix, XYZ

1363/100
.robot

0G, Automattic, GoDaddy Registry, Identity Digital, Intercap, Internet Land & Cattle, Link Freedom Group, Nano Labs, Pingyang Chamber of Commerce

934/100
.agi

0G, GoDaddy Registry, Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group, OpenAI, Radix, ShortDot

744/100
.asi

Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group, OpenAI, Radix, Starlight (Namecheap)

524/100
.mcp

Google, Identity Digital, OpenAI, Radix, ShortDot

558/100
.robotics

Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group, Puppap Dot AI, Radix, XYZ

542/100
.gpt

Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group, OpenAI

338/100
.intelligence

Google, Radix, Starlight (Namecheap)

337/100
.model

GoDaddy Registry, Identity Digital, OpenAI

350/100
.agentic

Link Freedom Group, Radix

234/100
.agnt

Identity Digital, Kingfish

231/100
.agt

AI Safety Asia, Identity Digital

222/100
.llm

Identity Digital, Link Freedom Group

238/100
.agentid

GoDaddy Registry

124/100
.aiglasses

Meta

118/100
.compute

Identity Digital

139/100
.evals

OpenAI

124/100
.prompt

Prompt Domains

132/100
.robotaxi

Uber

124/100
.superintelligence

Meta

122/100

Big tech · registries and registrars · everyone else. The AI score is our rating of how valuable an address on the string would be, out of 100; how it works.

.agent: all 13 applications →OpenAI's applications →Google's applications →Meta's applications →

The 2012 round

What most 2012 TLDs became

773 TLDs from the 2012 round are live, are not brands and reported a figure for May 2026. The median holds 4,225 domains. 249 hold under 1,000. The ten largest hold 61.5% of the domains across all 773.

2012-round TLDs by domains held, May 2026

  • Under 1,000249
  • 1,000 to 9,999median260
  • 10,000 to 99,999211
  • 100,000 to 999,99944
  • 1 million or more9

The ten largest: .xyz, .top, .shop, .online, .store, .site, .vip, .app, .bond, .lol.

Every TLD in Stats →

Dot-brands

108 of the 436 brand TLDs that launched from the 2012 round have since been retired. The median live one holds 7 domains.

New words

967 of the 986 strings in this round were never applied for in 2012.

Own a domain that uses one of this round's words?See what it is worth →
Brands and geography

Japan is second in brand applications

333 applications are for brand TLDs. 219 companies applied for nothing but brands. In the company table below, 23 of them are listed by what they do instead, such as ByteDance (big tech).

Japanese companies filed 61, second only to the United States with 151. German companies filed 6; in 2012, by our count, they filed 31.

Brand applications by country, 2026

  • United States151 · 2012: 203
  • Japan61 · 2012: 46
  • China18 · 2012: 14
  • France9 · 2012: 26
  • Sweden9 · 2012: 7
  • Spain8 · 2012: 7
  • United Kingdom8 · 2012: 19
  • Singapore8 · 2012: 6
  • Germany6 · 2012: 31

The tick marks 2012: applications for strings we classed as brands (523 in all). ICANN's 2026 brand flag is a different measure from ours, so read the large gaps, not the small ones.

Where applicants are based

Applications and companies by ICANN region
RegionApplicationsCompanies
North America864148
Europe50699
Asia-Pacific217141
Africa167
Latin America and the Caribbean118

ICANN assigns regions by country and places British overseas territories, such as the Cayman Islands, in Europe. A company with legal entities in two regions is counted in each, so the companies column adds up to 403, not 402.

Companies

Every company in the round

402 companies, largest first. Each links to its page: its applications, the legal names it filed under and the strings it is on.

The companies in this round already run the TLDs that hold 86% of all new-gTLD domains: 48.2 million of 56.0 million in April 2026. That is the newest month in our table of registry families; the other domain counts on this page are for May 2026.

539 applications (33%) were filed under a legal name that does not name the company. The largest: Registry Services, LLC (GoDaddy Registry, 77), Charleston Road Registry Inc. (Google, 39), Toddler Logic, LLC (Identity Digital, 19).

Every company in the 2026 round, by applications
CompanyApplicationsContested
Identity Digital21673%
Link Freedom Group15875%
XYZ13972%
GoDaddy Registry7786%
Intercap7176%
Radix4689%
ShortDot4080%
Starlight (Namecheap)4053%
Google3933%
Oinkadot2548%
Suffix2454%
NextGEN TLDs2250%
Method and sources · as of 7 October 2026

How we counted

Every figure on this page comes from one snapshot: ICANN's application list as downloaded at 18:07 UTC on 7 October 2026, our grouping of legal names into companies, and the sources below. The replacement-period box near the top is the exception: it updates live. The rest changes when we publish a new snapshot.

Company
The business behind an application. We grouped ICANN's 480 legal names into 402 companies using what the applicants told ICANN in their applications. Each company's page quotes the answer behind each grouping.
Contest
A string with two or more applications. ICANN calls it a contention set. Our contests match ICANN's published contention sets one for one.
Usable backup
Each application could name one backup string to switch to in the replacement period. A usable backup is one ICANN lists as active: no other applicant named it as a primary or a backup (Applicant Guidebook 5.1). Only an application with one can switch. Two applications on one string are a contest (5.2), so where one applicant named the same backup in several applications, or named a string it already applies for, fewer contests can end than the count of usable backups suggests. Our figures allow for that.
Kind of company
Registry: already runs one or more TLDs. Registrar or host: sells domains or hosting. Big tech: a large technology company; Google counts as big tech although it runs TLDs. Crypto: a blockchain or crypto company. New portfolio: a company that does not run TLDs today and applied for several. We assigned these kinds by hand for every company with three or more applications that are not all brands, and for some others whose ICANN flags would misdescribe them, such as large technology companies that applied only for brands. The rest we sorted by ICANN's flags: brand if every application is for a brand; community, geo or supported if ICANN flags any of its applications as community, geographic or applicant support; otherwise other.
A legal name that does not name the company
A legal name with no distinctive word of the company's name and not its initials. Registry Services, LLC (GoDaddy Registry) counts. A name like XYZ.COM LLC (XYZ) or Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) does not.
Closest 2012 bets
For each string, our AI picked up to three strings from the 2012 round that made the most similar bet, choosing from the whole 2012 list without being told what became of any of them. Each string page shows them with the reasons.
Domains held
Registered domains at the end of May 2026, from the registries' monthly reports to ICANN, as shown on our Stats pages.