.biotech
Is .biotech a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
.biotech is contested: 2 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 7 October 2026. They are Identity Digital and Radix.
A clear label for life-science companies, but most serious biotech firms will still choose .com or shorter alternatives over it.
biotech and life-science startups, research labs, CROs, sector investors and conference/media brands wanting an on-the-nose industry address, plus established pharma registering defensively
One of 46 ICANN 2026-round applications Radix announced on its own applications page. Radix states it intends to build and operate each TLD it wins.
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet in shorter form: a life-sciences sector shorthand sold as primary identity to research-and-product companies in that field, winning only if firms accept a sector label in place of a corporate .com.
The sibling half of the compound — an industry-shorthand noun whose whole premise is that companies self-identify by sector rather than by name, differing mainly in that it is a horizontal with a far larger registrant pool than a single vertical.
Also a narrow, capital-intensive technical-industry category noun aimed at operating companies rather than consumers or a licensed profession, so it lives or dies on whether a modest population of specialist firms will re-home their primary identity.
What a .biotech domain is
.biotech is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our AI & tech category. 2 applications for it are on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.
Is the .biotech domain extension real yet?
.biotech is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .biotech domain?
You can’t yet. A .biotech name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .biotech was .bio, delegated on 2 June 2014.
Is .biotech a real TLD?
Not yet. .biotech is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .biotech is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.
“GEL2647T-T73865 · Glass Emotion, LLC · primary · contention set 2026-25 RTIS2674T-T50870 · Radix Technologies Inc SEZC · primary · contention set 2026-25”ICANN
“Radix has applied for these TLDs; we do not own or operate them today.”Radix
- I place .biotech in the 30-49 band (usable but limited). The string names a large, well-funded industry, and by analogy with other industry-descriptive TLDs there is plausible steady registration demand from startups, labs, and service firms, plus defensive registrations from established players. It is not in the 50-69 band because, reasoning from analogy, the same buyer already has shorter competing options — .com remains the sector default for credibility with investors and regulators, and the shorter .bio (an existing TLD, cited as analogy) covers the identical audience with fewer characters — so genuine sustained primary-identity use on .biotech would need explaining and the aftermarket is likely thin. It is not in the 10-29 band because this is a serious commercial vertical, not a vanity or event-driven string: descriptive-industry TLDs, by analogy with startup-oriented strings like .tech, do attract real end-use at volume when priced accessibly, and the applicant is an operator of several such TLDs, which supports adoption likelihood. Specific registration, pricing, or renewal figures for comparable strings are unknown to me under the rules here, so all volume judgments are qualitative. My main market uncertainty: whether funded biotech companies, a conservative and compliance-minded buyer group, will accept any descriptive TLD as a primary identity at meaningful rates, or treat such domains as landing pages and redirects only.