.look
Is .look a real TLD? Who’s applying to run it?
.look is not contested. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list, as of 8 October 2026. It is Intercap. Intercap named .look as a backup string for its .find application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup. Link Freedom Group named .look as a backup string for its .pop application. ICANN deactivated it, because another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup.
A catchy word for fashion and style sites, but most serious brands will treat it as a fun extra, not their main address.
fashion, beauty, and eyewear brands, stylists, and creators publishing lookbooks or 'shop the look' pages; secondarily visual-search and photography projects wanting a short verb domain.
In LFG's published list of 300+ strings submitted before the ICANN window closed on 2026-08-12. Their catalog tagline: “Bringing vision into focus.”
Named on the ICANN gTLD application list, 7 October 2026 as a replacement (backup) string of the applicant's .find application, shown as deactivated: another applicant applied for the same string or named it as a backup
The 2012 applications making the most similar bet. Chosen by AI from every string in that round, without being told what happened to any of them.
Same bet: a short, non-category abstract word about appearance that no single industry owns, sold open to fashion/beauty/personal-brand registrants who buy it for connotation rather than because it names their trade.
Same bet on an everyday English verb-that-is-also-a-noun whose value is the display/presentation gesture it implies, so the registry must manufacture a use case rather than inherit one from an existing vertical.
Same class of soft one-syllable verb with no defined registrant pool — the wager is that the word is cheap to say and fun to complete, not that any profession or category will move its primary identity onto it.
What a .look domain is
.look is not a TLD yet. It is a string on our record of the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, in our Commerce category. One application for it is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list.
Is the .look domain extension real yet?
.look is not yet a domain extension you can register: nothing resolves under it, and no registrar sells names in it. It is a string applicants have put forward in the ICANN 2026 new gTLD round, the process that decides whether it becomes one.
When can you buy a .look domain?
You can’t yet. A .look name can only be registered once the string is delegated (added to the DNS root) and its registry opens. Last round's closest parallel to .look was .style, delegated on 4 February 2015.
Is .look a real TLD?
Not yet. .look is not in the DNS root, so nothing resolves under it. It’s here because .look is on ICANN’s Reveal Day list of applied-for strings. Every entry on this page links to its source.
- Intercap · first recordedICANN
- Link Freedom Group · now deactivated backupICANN
- Link Freedom Group · now abandonedICANN
- Intercap · first recordedICANN
- Link Freedom Group · first recordedLink Freedom Group
“IRI2679T-T28109 · Intercap Registry Inc. · replacement string of .find · Deactivated IRI2679T-T92731 · Intercap Registry Inc. · primary LFGL2683T-T14279 · Link Freedom Group Ltd · replacement string of .pop · Deactivated”ICANN
“.look · Lifestyle · “Bringing vision into focus.””Link Freedom Group
- Band chosen: 30-49, usable but limited. The string is a short, common English verb/noun with genuine semantic fit for fashion, beauty, and eyewear ('the look', lookbooks, shop-the-look commerce) and it reads naturally left-of-dot in phrase domains, which supports steady if unspectacular registration demand. By analogy (flagged as analogy), single-word lifestyle and style-adjacent gTLDs such as .style, .fashion, and .watch have historically produced modest zones dominated by defensive and speculative registrations rather than primary identities, and verb TLDs like .click and .link have moved volume mainly on price; there is little sign in that cohort of a real aftermarket or of serious projects choosing the TLD as their flagship address. It is not in the 50-69 band because there is no identifiable buyer segment where .look would function as a primary-identity default with sustained resale demand; adoption would need explaining everywhere and would compete with .com, .shop, .style, and social handles. It is not in the 10-29 band because the word is broad, positive, and commercially resonant rather than a joke or a narrow vanity string, and lookbook/creator use cases give it more than event-driven appeal. Applicant context, stated neutrally: the announced applicant, Link Freedom Group, filed more than 300 strings in the ICANN 2026 round and published its catalog, listing .look under 'Lifestyle' with the tagline 'Bringing vision into focus.'; a portfolio of that breadth is a neutral fact I use only to note that per-string marketing attention is an open question for adoption, not as a judgment of the operator. Comparable-cohort pricing, zone sizes, and renewal figures are unknown to me under the rules here, so all volume expectations are qualitative. Main market uncertainty over the next 5 years: whether the creator/fashion economy adopts short verb domains for 'look' pages and link-in-bio style microsites at all, or continues consolidating identity on platforms and .com, which would cap .look at low-value defensive and hobby registrations.